Best LumApps Alternative: Happeo | Intranet Software
LumApps alternative: Comparing LumApps with Happeo
LumApps is a French software company that has been offering its services since 2012. With offices in San Francisco, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo and Lyon and over 200 employees, LumApps is truly a global operation. The CMS intranet software LumApps positions itself as a collaborative intranet platform for Google Workspace (formerly G Suite) users with the goal to connect, inform and engage employees. LumApps is an intranet platform for companies that want both top-down and bottom-up communication and are looking for a tool that will help improve both employee collaboration and content management. While LumApps also integrates with Google Workspace, their approach is different from Happeo's.
Reviews also show that the software lacks a smooth global search function, advanced editing and formatting features for content creation. Some advanced social features are missing as well, like being able to tag groups in posts. The digital workplace LumApps calls itself a social-collaborative intranet, while Happeo is a full Google Workspace communication and engagement tool, making it the best LumApps alternative. Read more about the functionality of LumApps intranet compared to Happeo in our comparison table and in our conclusion below. Want to see and compare other LumApps alternatives? Visit our intranet platforms comparison.
Feature overview
| Digital workplace | Happeo | Lumapps |
|---|---|---|
| Search | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third-party app launcher | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrated Drive Editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrated Docs editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrated Sheets editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrated Slides editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collaboration platform | Happeo | Lumapps |
|---|---|---|
| Employee directory | ✓ | ✗ |
| Slack integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| User-creatable channels | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Hangouts conferencing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrated Calendar editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Jabber, Webex integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Social intranet | Happeo | Lumapps |
|---|---|---|
| Page builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Social channels | ✓ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Personalized news feed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Announcements | ✓ | ✓ |
| Widgets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branded file templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Influencer analysis | ✓ | ✗ |
| Overall features | Happeo | Lumapps |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile intranet app | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Sign On | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO compliant security | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Top-down communications | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bottom-up communications | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multilingual | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deep Google Workspace integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| User-first design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fast time to deploy | ✓ | ✗ |
| Google Workspace integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Office 365 integration | ✓ | ✓ |
Happeo vs LumApps Insights
LumApps integrates with the Google Workspace by linking to files
LumApps and Happeo are both Google partners that add a smart enterprise portal to Google Workspace solutions. Integration is easy for both softwares; however, the LumApps intranet integrates with Google Workspace by linking to folders, files and locations. In Happeo, the recommended intranet by Google, you can edit files directly on the platform, making it for many users the preferred Lumapps alternative.
LumApps is great for top-down communication
LumApps and Happeo are both tools for top-down and bottom-up communication. However, reviews show that with LumApps it is harder for employees to share information, such as best practices. With LumApps users have less opportunity to customize their homepage and to decide which content is most relevant to them. This has an impact on the engagement rate. Also, LumApps requires admins to create new channels. Happeo’s approach is more bottom-up: restrictable, but best suited for users to have more freedom.
LumApps focuses on static communication
LumApps and Happeo both shifted from a static to a dynamic intranet solution, which encourages top-down and bottom-up communication. Both providers have powerful page builders. Because Happeo has chat integration and allows social channels to be created by anyone, Happeo is more suited for dynamic communication. In addition, the pages LumApps creates are fairly simple and don't allow for more complex adjustments.
LumApps does not support multiple domains in Google Workspace
It is often possible to add multiple domains to your Google Workspace or Cloud Identity account. However, Happeo can be installed across your multi-domain Google Workspace environment, providing your employees with one unified platform.
LumApps' public reviews
Compare Happeo reviews and LumApps reviews on portals such as G2.com. Happeo has more than 50 reviews by clients with an average score of 4.5 of 5 points, while LumApps scores 2.9 on average. Some reviews also mention that Happeo pricing is better than the LumApps pricing. The pricing of both companies depends on the package and on the number of users. See the reviews here.
LumApps & Happeo's mobile apps
Happeo and LumApps both have an app for mobile use. According to reviews, the LumApps app's design and features differ between desktop and mobile, affecting its usability for users. Happeo on the other hand keeps improving its mobile application to ensure the best user interface and user experience. The Happeo app receives positive reviews due to its usability and good notification settings.
Booking a demo online
Happeo and LumApps both offer good customer service and free demos. The LumApps demo, as well as the Happeo demo, can be easily booked via their websites. Happeo’s demo is always conducted by a qualified sales representative. According to reviews, customers value Happeo’s customer service and competency, while LumApps' service can be disconnected from customer's deployment at times.
LumApps' usability insights
LumApps takes a different approach to usability. This applies to not only the app but the desktop version as well. Common usability differences experienced by users include the limited amount of comments displayed, with the majority of comments hidden behind a "show more" button. It is often hard to make page layouts visually compelling due to limited text formatting options.